Back to Archives Current Issue Subscribe Guestbook Contact EarthWINS Links

EarthWINS Daily #3.44
1/11/98

Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 00:34:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Alice McCombs <amccombs@igc.apc.org>

Contents

1. RUSSIA: Miners Faced Closures & Anti-Labor Offensive
2. MEXICO: More on Chiapas Massacre
  a. ACTION ALERT: World Wide Action on Chiapas Massacre Monday January 12
  b. MEX/USA: Indigenous place Clinton into Holiday Hall of Shame
3. ENVIRONMENT: World Bank to Let Axe Fall on Rainforests?
4. FYI: New Guinea/rainforest pages

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1. RUSSIA: Miners Faced Closures & Anti-Labor Offensive

labornews                        labr.global              12:28 PM  Jan 10, 1998

#RUSSIA: MINERS FIRST TARGET AS ANTI-WORKER OFFENSIVE BEGINS

#By Renfrey Clarke

#MOSCOW -  According to  recently announced  plans of the Russian
government, 1998  is to  be the  year  when  the  country's  coal
industry is  gutted and  cut up,  with the  most toothsome chunks
ready for handing over to private owners. For scores of thousands
of workers  the result  will be  joblessness,  with  only  vague,
unreliable promises of retraining and resettlement.
#But miners  in  the  country's  leading  coal  region  have  now
pledged: Only  over our  determined resistance! On December 29 an
extraordinary congress  of miners'  delegates in the Kuzbass, the
West Siberian region that is Russia's largest coal producer, drew
up a  series of  tough resolutions  addressed  to  the  country's
president, government and parliament.

#If key  demands were  not met,  the miners  indicated, a general
strike of the region's coal sector would be organised.

#Of some  200 coal  mines  currently  operating  in  Russia,  the
government plans to shut down no fewer than 86 by the end of this
year. According to the Moscow daily <I>Segodnya,<D> employment in
the country's  coal sector  has already  fallen by 18 per cent in
the past two years, to a current total of 359,000 workers. If the
planned closures  go ahead,  the paper  states, the  number could
shrink by a further 100,000.

#The ``restructuring''  of the  Russian coal  industry is  to  be
financed by  a US$800  million loan from the World Bank, approved
during December.  Half this  sum was due to be handed over by the
end of  1997. Delivery by the bank of a second tranche, of US$200
million, has  been made  conditional on  the  Russian  government
carrying out a coal privatisation program.

#From a  figure in  December of  8.5 per  cent, the proportion of
Russia's coal  produced by privately-owned mines is to rise to 50
per cent  by the  end of  1998. During December, large packets of
shares were  sold in three ``promising, profitable'' Kuzbass open
pits.

#Supporters of the government's strategies argue that large-scale
mine closures  are inevitable,  since the  coal sector,  reported
recently to  have debts  equivalent to  almost US$8  billion,  is
technically bankrupt.  Numerous mines  have wage  debts to  their
workers  going  back  six  or  even  nine  months,  and  continue
producing only because of state subsidies.

#But in  many cases, the mines are loss-making mainly because the
state  has   withheld  investment   funds,  and  because  of  the
peculiarities of  state accounting.  In the Pechora coal basin in
the far  north of  European Russia, almost all the mines run at a
loss. But  the  Moscow  newspaper  <I>Nezavisimaya  Gazeta<D>  in
December cited a study indicating that eight of the nine mines at
Vorkuta,  the   main  Pechora   coal  centre,   were  potentially
profitable. The  taxes and  penalties the mines were being forced
to pay,  the report  indicated, were  greater than  the subsidies
they received.

#In all  the Russian  coal regions, mines suffer from the failure
of customers  to pay for deliveries. According to <I>Izvestiya<D>
on December 18, some 56 per cent of the overdue debts to the coal
industry are  owed by  power plants, which in turn are owed large
sums by  government instrumentalities.  To a  substantial degree,

                           1

the need  to pay  subsidies to  coal mines  - subsidies  that are
cited as  proof of  the need  for mine  closures - flows from the
government's own failure to pay its debts.

#Closures of  worked-out mines  are an inevitable feature of coal
production.  But  the  Russian  government  plans  to  shut  down
numerous mines  containing large  reserves of  coal that in other
countries and  times would  be considered  well worth extracting.
Once the pits are closed, these reserves are lost for good.

#Markets for  the output  of these  mines allegedly do not exist.
Demand for  coal in  Russia, especially  from  the  metallurgical
industry, has  fallen sharply  during the  1990s.  But  there  is
nothing natural  or  inevitable  about  the  decline  of  Russian
metallurgy; it  is an  aspect of  the country's six-year economic
depression, which  was induced  deliberately to serve the ends of
neo-liberal  ``shock   therapy''.

#Even   in  circumstances   of depression, the argument that markets
do not exist for the output of existing  mines starts to look  suspicious
if  we consider  a point revealed  by <I>Segodnya<D>  in December.  Despite
the loss
during 1998 of as many as 100,000 coal industry jobs, actual coal
output is not expected to fall significantly.

#While close  to half  the existing  mines will shut down, output
will  be   expanded  at  a  relatively  small  number  of  highly
productive mines,  chiefly open  pits. Average  costs per ton, at
least as computed by coal firm accountants, will fall.

#To the  financial oligarchs  who are  being invited to take over
Russia's coal  industry, these policies make excellent sense. But
if the likely social costs of coal industry ``restructuring'' are
taken into account, the benefits are by no means clear.

#In the depths of a depression, other work for laid-off miners is
hard to  find. And if taking up another job means shifting house,
these workers  often face  a hopeless  dilemma; continuing, acute
housing shortages  mean that affordable alternative accommodation
can rarely be found.

#If laid-off  miners had to be treated in civilised fashion, with
job retraining  and alternative  work, the  cheapest  course  for
Russian society  as a  whole would  often be  to keep loss-making
mines open.

#For political reasons, the Russian government has been forced to
announce adjustment  programs for  miners in  the pits  that  are
being shut down. But in the experience of the workers themselves,
the government's  real strategy is often to try to force them out
without any compensation whatever.

#``If you  don't pay  people their  wages for five or six months,
they'll make  off of  their own  accord, and  you don't  have  to
create any  new jobs,''  Aman Tuleev,  the governor  of  Kemerovo
Province, pointed  out to journalists recently. Kemerovo Province
includes the Kuzbass region.

#Where coal  industry workers  stay on the job for long enough to
be made  redundant, the  programs for  their  support  are  often
merely token  - or  the funds are misdirected by officials. Since
1994, <I>Nezavisimaya  Gazeta<D> reported  on December 3, a total
of 17  mines have  shut down in the Kuzbass. Of 17,000 people put
out of  work, only  7 per  cent have  been placed in new jobs. An
appeal sent  to the president and prime minister by miners in the
Maritime District of the Russian Far East in mid-December charged

                           2

that mine  shutdowns were occurring without the creation of jobs,
and that social welfare commitments to miners were not being met.

#Increasingly, Russian coal workers are coming to the conclusion:
the process through which their industry is being cut up for sale
to private  business is  not in  their  interests.  The  Maritime
District  miners,   <I>Segodnya<D>  reported   on  December   17,
``consider that  the coal  sector  in  Russia  should  be  state-
owned.''

#The demand for a halt to privatisation has not figured so far in
the demands  of miners at the national level, where the focus has
remained on  forcing the  government to meet its promises to coal
industry workers.  But as  the miners' protests gain in scope and
militancy, the  desire of  rank and file miners to go into battle
around the  call for  social ownership  of their  industry  -  an
essential condition  if its  restructuring is  not to be a social
catastrophe - seems certain to spread.

#Since early  December the  miners' protest movement has taken on
an edge  of desperation,  as the costs of coal production in dead
and injured  workers have  risen to horrific levels. In the small
hours of  December 2,  a methane  explosion in  the Zyryanovskaya
mine in the Kuzbass claimed 67 lives - the worst mine disaster in
the region since 1944.

#No less  appalling than  this  tragedy  has  been  the  steadily
increasing number  of deaths in ``lesser'' accidents. At the time
of the  Zyryanovskaya explosion,  the number  of  lives  lost  in
Russian coal mines during 1997 already stood at 158 - a figure 32
per cent worse than in 1996.

#According to  miners'  leaders,  prime  responsibility  for  the
carnage lies  with the  government, which  has failed  to provide
adequate funds  to stop  safety management  breaking down  at all
levels. The  number of safety inspections has dropped. Mines have
been left  without money to repair ventilating systems, and to to
buy and maintain safety equipment.

#``With the  current level  of financing,  carrying out this work
properly is  impossible,'' Ivan Mokhnachuk, deputy chairperson of
the Russian  Union of  Coal Industry  Workers, told the newspaper
<I>Trud<D> in December.

#As  well  as  seeing  important  strategy  meetings  by  miners'
delegates, the  Kuzbass in December witnessed the dramatic use of
direct action  by rank  and file  miners. In the city of Anzhero-
Sudzhensk on  December 22  about 250  workers blocked  the Trans-
Siberian Railway for ten hours, demanding wages owed from as much
as eight months back.

#Meanwhile, a group of miners from the Pechora basin were staging
a hunger  strike in the Moscow offices of Rosugol, the state coal
industry holding company.

#Through its  plans for  massive lay-offs, in circumstances where
it has  neither the  will nor  the ability  to  provide  for  the
workers involved,  the Russian  government has  signalled that it
aims to  deal a  knock-out blow to the miners, the best-organised
and most combative sector of the Russian working class.

#The assault  on the  miners will  be the  spearhead  of  a  much
broader    anti-worker     offensive,    as     the    capitalist
counterrevolution in  Russia enters its most aggressive phase. In
other signs of what is to come, Economy Minister Yakov Urinson on

                           3

December 30  revealed that the government plans to cut the number
of defence sector enterprises by nearly two-thirds - from 1700 at
present to  670 in  the year  2000. And  on January  6, under the
headline   "A    Reform   More   Painful   than   Privatisation",
<I>Izvestiya<D> outlined  a new  labour code,  currently  at  the
drafting stage,  through which  the government  plans to  ``bring
order to  the relations between employer and employee.'' Modelled
in part  on neo-liberal  legislation in  New Zealand,  this draft
code would  reduce trade  unions to  playing a  marginal role  in
relations between workers and employers.

#In plotting  their anti-labour  offensive, Russia's  rulers have
perhaps cast their minds back to September-October 1993, when the
application of  ruthless, illegal  force was  enough to overthrow
the country's  old parliament  and to  humble the  elite factions
that backed it.

#But the  Russian working  class is  not a  cabal of nomenklatura
losers, despised  by the  population  and  outmanoeuvred  without
great  difficulty.  To  a  large  degree  Russian  wage  workers,
numbering  more   than  60  million,  <I>are<D>  the  population.
Millions of  these people  now have  little to lose if they mount
desperate resistance.

#The latter  is particularly  true of the miners, who have strong
traditions of  solidarity and are well able to provide leadership
for much  broader working-class  layers. The Russian government's
efforts to dismember the coal industry, in short, could finish up
with the  country's rulers  facing the most determined opposition
they have met throughout their entire restorationist project.

Back to top

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

2. MEXICO: More on Chiapas Massacre

a. ACTION ALERT: World Wide Action on Chiapas Massacre Monday January 12

moonlight                         indig.info              12:55 PM  Jan 10, 1998

INTERNATIONAL DAY OF ACTION
MONDAY, JANUARY 12, 1998

MEMORIAL ACT AND PROTEST
STARTING AT THE EL PASO FEDERAL BUILDING 700 SAN ANTONIO ST
ENDING MEXICAN CONSULATE 900 SAN ANTONIO STREET
4PM

STOP U.S. MILITARY AID TO MEXICO!

END THE WAR IN CHIAPAS!

"Key objective: "To destroy the relationship of support which exists between
the population and the transgressors of the law...military intelligence
services should secretly organize certain sectors of the civilian
population...ranchers...small businessmen...individuals...train and support
self-defense forces or other paramilitary organizations...in cases where
self-defense forces do not exist, it is necessary to create them"

Excerpt from document from
Seventh Military Region
Mexican Federal Army
Tuxtla Gutierrez, Chiapas

Aided by a graduate of the School of Americas in the United States, General
Jose Ruben Rivas PeÒa, 1980 graduate, the Mexican Army has been implementing
a counterinsurgency strategy which revealed itself with the massacre of 45
Indian men, women and children on December 22 of 1997.

An International Day of Action on January 12th has been called for by the
Zapatistas and the FZLN in response to the massacre in Chiapas and the
growing threat of open warfare in Chiapas. The complicity of  Mexican state
and federal authorities in the killings remains unresolved.  The illegal
incursions of the Mexican military has resulted in beatings, harassment,
widespread terror and the displacement of Zapatista communities.   These
actions continue unabated in spite of the resignations of highly placed PRI
officials.

These facts signal a continuation of the policies which led to the massacre.
Most disturbing are concerns about the ease with which US military aid is
being used for counter-insurgency efforts in Mexico.  As one commentator
from MSNBC noted in reference to the massacre and continuing violence in
Chiapas, "the CIA has left its footprints-again allying itself with
questionable elements within a foreign country's military." ("Planning the
CIA's Next Secret War," Michael Moran, MSNBC)

 The Comite de Apoyo Zapatista joins the call made by the National
Commission for Democracy in Mexico, the Zapatista Front for National
Liberation, and an international support network in  Spain, France, Italy,
Switzerland,  Canada and more than 24 cities in the U.S  in holding events
as part of an international day of protest on January 12, 1998.

In addition the Comite encourages El Pasoans to contact Congressman
Silvestre Reyes to raise their concerns about US military involvement in
Mexico, to ask his staff to attend a briefing for the Congressional Human
Rights Caucus regarding the situation in Chiapas on January 15th at 11am in
Washington DC;  to ask him to co-sponsor legislation to suspend all military
aid to Mexico which includes equipment and training to the Mexican
military, in accordance to the provisions established under the Leahy
Amendment; and to seek a full public disclosure of the amount and type of
assistance the US has given to Mexico and an accounting of how it has been
used.

For more information, contact 532-8382.

Back to top

-----------------------------------------------

b. MEX/USA: Indigenous place Clinton into Holiday Hall of Shame

DEBRA                          hrnet.indigenous           10:02 PM  Jan  7, 1998
(at OLN.comlink.apc.org)                                  (From News system)

Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Edited/Distributed by HURINet - The Human Rights Information Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------
## author     : saiic@igc.apc.org
## date       : 06.01.98
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Jose Matus
1-800-682-4280
Joe Garcia
520-791-3008

Indigenous Alliance Condemns Slaughter in Chiapas

President Clinton Inducted into Holiday Hall of Shame

  TUCSON, Ariz. -- An Indigenous human rights alliance has
  inducted President Clinton into the "Holiday Hall of
  Shame" for failure to appy pressure on Mexico to uphold
  the human rights of Indigenous peoples. The Alianza
  Indigena Sin Fronteras, Indigenous Alliance Without
  Borders, condemned the slaughter of 45 women, men and
  chidren in Chiapas, shot and hacked to death by machetes.
  "This is just plain terrorism," said O'odham in Mexico Lt.
  Gov. Jose Garcia, among the cofounders of the recently
  formed human rights organization. Jose Matus, Yaqui
  ceremonial leader in South Tucson, urged President Clinton
  to join with other countries to apply economic sanctions
  against Mexico to ensure civl rights and human rights for
  Indigenous peoples. "President Clinton has just closed his
  eyes and ears to what is going on in Mexico," said Matus,
  director of the Arizona Border Rights Project. Matus said
  President Clinton should have apppied pressure during
  NAFTA and U.S. loan negotiations to ensure human rights in
  Mexico. "The United States has to put pressure on the
  Mexican government to do something. But, my take on it is,
  it won't," Matus said. "No one really cares about human
  rights. We have suffered genocide, the takeover of our
  lands and been outcast in the community. That is our
  problem in Mexico," said Matus, whose tribe lives in
  Arizona and Mexico. While Americans celebrated Christmas
  with their families, Indigenous people in the village of
  Acteal, Mexico, buried 21 women, nine men, 14 children and
  one infant in plain wood coffins. The farmers were shot to
  death Dec. 22. Pro- government forcers of the PRI have
  been arrested for supplying the weapons. Lt. Gov. Garcia
  said ranchers and the Mexican government seizes the land
  of Indigenous peoples, who most often do not have a title
  to the oil and gas rich land where they live and survive
  by raising corn and other crops. Lt. Gov. Garcia said
  people in the United States, including Indian Nations and
  his own tribe, the O'odham Nation in Sells, Ariz., are
  comfortable and show no mercy to the less fortunate. "They
  are so used to government aid -- another form of
  government control -- they forget about the O'odham and
  other tribes in Mexico," Lt. Gov. Garcia said. Maria
  Garcia, spokeswoman for the northwestern tribes in Sonora,
  Mexico, said the savage violence was meant to provoke the
  Zapatista rebels. The owner of La Indita Restaurant in
  Tucson said weapons have been supplied by the United
  States to eliminate the Zapatistas who are fighting for
  Indigenous rights. The victims of the Dec. 22 massacre
  were members of the Indigenous group Las Abejas -- the
  Bees -- who support the goals of the Zapatistas, but not
  the armed struggle. Alliance member and news reporter
  Brenda Norrell said, "It is unconscionable that the United
  States government -- while pretending to be the human
  rights champion of the world -- ignores the slaughter of
  women, men and children." "The United States pretends to
  be the big brother of the world's helpless. But in
  reality, it undermines human rights as it masterminds
  corporate greed," said Norrell, editor of the Fort
  McDowell Indian Commuinity Newsletter in Arizona and
  columnist for the The Circle in Minneapolis. Alliance
  members, including Tohono O'odham Mike Flores, were
  members of an Indigenous delegation to Chiapas in 1995.
  The alliance was formed in August on Tohono O'odham tribal
  land in San Xavier, Ariz. In a written statement, the
  alliance said, "What would happen if 45 Indian women, men
  and children in Arizona, New Mexico or North Dakota were
  shot and hacked to death? Does it matter less that they
  are Indian people living in Mexico, our neighbors to the
  South?"

Back to top

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

3. ENVIRONMENT: World Bank to Let Axe Fall on Rainforests?

newsdesk              The Inter Press Service in English   3:09 PM  Jan 10, 1998

       Copyright 1997 InterPress Service, all rights reserved.
          Worldwide distribution via the APC networks.

                      *** 07-Jan-98 ***

By Abid Aslam

WASHINGTON, Jan 7 (IPS) - The World Bank, the world's leading
investor in forest projects in developing countries, says it aims
to clean up the global timber industry but is fuelling fears that
it wants to start financing logging operations in tropical
rainforests.

Bank President James Wolfensohn meets leading international
loggers and hand-picked environmental groups Friday, to chart the
lending agency's future course as a champion of 'sustainable' or
'low-impact' logging.

Trouble is, say critics, the Bank has barred from the talks
analysts who question whether 'sustainable' logging is possible
and also has ignored alternative approaches while overlooking the
harmful consequences of its policies and investments on the
world's forests.

At stake are the last of Earth's 'old growth' or 'primary'
forests, home to centuries-old trees largely untouched by humans.
These dense tracts have been referred to as the planet's 'lungs'
and are considered home to as-yet undiscovered species, including
plants with medicinal potential.

Only about 20 percent of these forests remain intact, mostly in
South America's Amazon Basin, Canada's Pacific Northwest, and the
boreal forests of Siberia. Nearly half of all remaining old growth
forests are at serious risk of destruction, according to
environmentalists. The endangered forests include those in the
West African nation of Gabon and on the Southeast Asian island of
Borneo.

''The Bank is pushing the notion of sustainable logging by
transnational corporations, but it has yet to produce the evidence
that such a thing can even exist in primary tropical
rainforests,'' said Randall Hayes, president of the Rainforest
Action Network (RAN).

That view likely will not be heard at Friday's meeting, as RAN
and other groups who challenge the notion of 'sustainable' logging
have been excluded. Also barred are environmentalists and
indigenous people from the countries and forest communities at
greatest risk from intensified logging.

The only developing-country participants expected on Friday are
loggers, including Mohammed 'Bob' Hasan, a close associate of
Indonesian President Suharto and head of the Indonesian Wood Panel
Association, APKINDO, a logging company plagued with widespread
allegations of environmental and human rights abuses.

A Bank spokeswoman pointed out that other participants include
David McDowell, head of the Switzerland-based World Conservation
Union (IUCN), which has affiliates in a number of developing
countries. She nevertheless conceded, ''it would have been better
to have an actual grassroots group.''

The Bank also is embarking upon a year-long review of its
forest policy, adopted in 1991 under heavy pressure from
environmentalists. Officials insist Friday's meeting will not
affect the policy review but analysts note the meeting's agenda is
dominated by discussions of what the Bank should do to improve
forest management.

''The Bank has a tendency to muddy the waters like this,'' said
Korinna Horta, an environmental economist at the Environmental
Defence Fund (EDF). ''The indications are that the Bank wants to
make changes in its operations - in other words, effectively
change the forest policy. But you can't review a policy without
looking at whether and how it has been implemented. We are afraid
there has been little implementation, yet we see signs the Bank is
ready to move away from it.''

The 1991 policy bans direct funding for logging projects in
tropical primary rainforests, limits Bank forestry lending to
governments which are committed to conservation, and emphasises
environmental protection and indigenous peoples' concerns.

Senior Bank officials in particular have stirred suspicions
that the ban on tropical logging will be overturned, by suggesting
that ''waivers'' be granted, permitting them to back projects they
otherwise could not.

''Instead of revising its forest policy to make new loans, the
Bank should revise its loan portfolio,'' said Randy Hayes,
president of the Rainforest Action Network (RAN), one of the
groups barred from Friday's meeting.

Hayes held that the Bank should use its lending power to
''promote paper production from agricultural waste rather than
wood. That's a bold, visionary path that I just don't see the
World Bank taking.'' Yet it is exactly the type of option the
Bank, as an avowed development agency, should pursue, he added.

''There has been not enough funding for alternative projects by
the Bank,'' Horta told IPS. In addition, ''most causes of forest
loss are outside the forests themselves, and the Bank's major
investments are helping to drive deforestation.''

Horta highlighted the Bank's insistence that borrowing
countries increase their exports - largely of primary commodities
including timber - to generate economic growth, and rein in state
spending. Budget cuts often result in lay-offs of government
forestry officials, she explained.

One well-placed senior analyst, who asked not to be identified,
said Bank officials also have failed to tackle basic cost issues
in the logging industry, because these have been opposed by the
loggers.

Timber companies generally must pay governments for permission
to operate in national forests but the payments are based on the
amount of timber the companies say was harvested, the analyst
explained. The companies usually seek out one type of tree - say,
hardwood Mahogany - but chop down dozens of other trees to get to
each Mahogany. Yet they pay only for the Mahogany.

Were the companies required to pay for the actual number of
trees felled or the area of forest land logged, they would be far
more careful in their work, the analyst argued, adding that Bank
officials should use Friday's meeting to urge such basic reforms.

However, officials are playing down the expected outcome of the
talks on Friday. ''The best they're hoping for is that everyone
will agree to continue to collaborate for forest eco-system
conservation, and to meet again,'' the Bank spokeswoman said.
(END/IPS/aa/97)

Origin: ROMAWAS/ENVIRONMENT/
                              ----

       [c] 1997, InterPress Third World News Agency (IPS)
                     All rights reserved

  May not be reproduced, reprinted or posted to any system or
  service outside  of  the  APC  networks,  without  specific
  permission from IPS.  This limitation includes distribution
  via  Usenet News,  bulletin board  systems, mailing  lists,
  print media  and broadcast.   For information about  cross-
  posting,  send   a   message  to   <online@ips.org>.    For
  information  about  print or  broadcast reproduction please
  contact the IPS coordinator at <online@ips.org>.

Back to top

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

4. FYI: New Guinea/rainforest pages

jorgensen                       reg.westpapua              6:55 PM  Jan  3, 1998
(at SSCL.UWO.CA)

Some of you may be interested to have a look at a set of pages I stumbled
across this morning on Kent University's web site.  It consists of the
pilot report of the project on the Future of Tropical Forest Peoples (APFT
is the French acronym), and is available in both French and English.  The
New Guinea sections cover both PNG and Irian Jaya (predominantly the
former) and contains pretty good summaries and comparisons of ecological
and other data on forest folks in this part of the world (Polly Wiessner
was a major contributor to this part of the overall report). It is
interesting in its own right, and would be useful for: anyone trying to
acquaint the rainforest contingent with the relevant ethnography; those
interested in comparative cultural ecology in the tropics; students
interested in how many Melanesians get a living.

The link to the PNG portion of the site is:

http://lucy.ukc.ac.uk/Sonja/RF/Ukpr/NG01.htm

The site has global coverage (Africa, Asia, the Americas as well as
Pacific); a detaled index can be found at:

http://lucy.ukc.ac.uk/Sonja/RF/Ukpr/Report_c.htm

Happy New Year to all,

D.

Back to top

Disclaimer

EarthWINS Daily is a project of EarthWINS.

** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, material in this issue of EarthWINS Daily is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. **

The articles in EarthWINS Daily are PHOTOCOPIES for personal informational purposes--please seek reprint permission directly from the source listed. You are encouraged to utilize this information for personal campaign use; including writing letters, organizing campaigns and forwarding. All efforts are made to provide accurate, timely pieces; though ultimate responsibility for verifying all information rests with the reader.

If you distribute information contained in EarthWINS Daily, please:

(1) Copy the information in its exact form,
(2) Cite the author, publisher, and date of the information.
(3) Include this subscription information for EarthWINS Daily - 

To subscribe to EarthWINS Daily send an email to 
EarthWINS-Daily-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Thank you!


Subscribe to EarthWINS_Daily
EarthWINS
P O Box 573
Shawano, WI 54166
Ph: 715-524-5998
FAX (call first): 715-524-9958
EarthWINS-Daily@earthwins.com
www.earthwins.com

Please sign my guestbook

Back to top