Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 00:35:55 -0800 (PST)
From: Alice McCombs <amccombs@igc.apc.org>

Contents

1. Excerpts, CAN: Regional News - Voisey's Bay Mining Update
2. ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION ALERT - Protect Your Right to Know
3. EPA Releases National Inventory of Contaminated Sediments

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1. Excerpts, CAN: Regional News - Voisey's Bay Mining Update

DEBRA                          hrnet.indigenous           12:21 PM  Jan  9, 1998
(at OLN.comlink.apc.org)                                  (From News system)

Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Edited/Distributed by HURINet - The Human Rights Information Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------
## author     : innuenv@web.net
## date       : 07.01.98
---------------------------------------------------------------------

CBC Regional News - Wednesday, December 17, 1997 AM NEWS

Voisey's Bay Nickel estimates it will pay out about
one-point-five billion dollars in direct employment benefits
during the 25-year operating life of its mine. That's
according to information in the company's environmental
impact statement. The six-thousand page, four-volume
document was submitted to an environmental  review panel
yesterday. The 15-million dollar study covers the mine and
mill proposal for Northern Labrador. The company says it has
developed a management system to protect the environment and
the livelihoods of people living nearby. The environmental
assessment will be studied by a review panel and will go
through public hearings. ----------- A spokesperson for the
Labrador Inuit Association says their land claims
negotiations are going well. Toby Andersen says talks with
the federal and provincial governments are now focusing on
Inuit self government. Andersen says the discussions are at
the "critical point" of funding for an Inuit government. The
talks will recess later this week for the holidays. Andersen
says they'll resume on the 8th of January. He's hopeful that
an agreement in principle will be reached by the end of
March. --------------

CBC Regional News - Wednesday, December 17, 1997 PM NEWS
=================

     The Voisey's Bay Nickel Company says it's confident its
     Environmental Impact statement for the Voisey's Bay
     mine and mill addresses all the concerns people might
     have about the project. The company has submitted the
     document to the joint panel that's overseeing the
     project. And it promises to do everything possible to
     minimize the impact of the mine and mill on people and
     the environment. Philip Daniel reports. DANIEL REPORT:
     Voisey's Bay Nickel says the massive project will
     create up to 80-thousand person-years of employment and
     pump more than four-billion dollars into the province
     over its lifetime. But it says because the mine and
     mill complex is in a remote area, and doesn't cover
     much land, the impact on wildlife and nearby
     communities should be minimal. The company says
     contaminated rock and tailings will be kept underwater
     in two ponds....and the entire site will be fully
     reclaimed once the project is over. It also says
     measures will be taken not to disrupt migrating
     caribou, and fish habitat will be protected as much as
     possible. The company says 60% of the jobs at the site
     will go to Labradorians...and the shift schedule will
     allow aboriginal employees to spend time on the land.
     The E-I-S is now being reviewed by the joint review
     panel, to make sure it has addressed all the
     issues....the panel's chairperson, Leslie Griffiths
     says they could ask for more information...but she
     doubts the process will drag on too long. GRIFFITHS
     CLIP: <<As far as the panel's concerned, We've been
     given some strict time lines for each step of the
     process that we're responsible for. So certainly the
     intent is not to have this process dragged out, but to
     carry it out as efficiently and effectively as
     possible,>> Griffiths says if the E-I-S is acceptable,
     there'll be three months for public reaction before
     hearings are scheduled...likely for May and June.

----

     The mayor of Placentia says the Argentia smelter
     project is full speed ahead. Recent comments by a
     Voisey's Bay Nickel vice president fueled speculation
     that the smelter site was being reconsidered. But Bill
     Hogan says that isn't true. David Cochrane reports.
     COCHRANE REPORT: Bill Hogan came to St. John's today
     looking for some answers. The mayor of placentia and
     several councillors met with Voisey's Bay nickel
     executives this afternoon to get to the bottom of
     rumours surrounding the Argentia Smelter. And Hogan
     says the rumours are just that -- rumours. HOGAN CLIP:
     <<<<<<Their plans are on-track . . . somewhat delayed
     by external factors but they're going ahead.>> Those
     external factors include a recent drop in the parent
     company Inco's stock prices, a lawsuit over the
     environmental assessment of the Argentia smelter, and
     threats of a takeover. But Hogan says the company gave
     him a commitment today that the smelter project will go
     ahead. HOGAN CLIP: <<<<<<<<They're trying to move as
     fast as they possibly can and we're more confident than
     ever that there's going to be a smelter refinery on the
     Argentia peninsula in the next year or so.>> Hogan said
     that as soon as the mining development in Voisey's Bay
     gets the green light, the smelter project will soon
     follow.

-----------

CBC Regional News - Monday, December 22, 1997 AM NEWS

Rumours and doubts continue to plague Inco's plans to build
a nickel smelter in Argentia. Today, the Globe and Mail
reports that Inco is reviewing its plans to build the
smelter to process ore from the nickel find in Voisey's Bay.
The report quotes unnamed sources and comes just days after
assurances by the company and the provincial government that
Argentia will see ground broken for a smelter. Investors
quoted in the report say Inco is being forced to take a hard
look at its plans because the company's stock has tumbled in
recent months.

----

CBC Regional News - Monday, December 22, 1997 PM NEWS

 Officials with Voisey's Bay Nickel Company aren't
 commenting this morning on questions raised about the
 future of the proposed smelter at Argentia. A Globe and
 Mail newspaper article says INCO is reviewing plans to
 construct a 1-billion dollar smelter at Argentia. Low
 nickel prices and a possible year-long delay of its plans
 to develop a mine in Northern Labrador have hurt the
 company. Today, INCO is worth less than the 4.3 billion
 dollars it paid to acquire the mineral discovery. The
 newspaper article says INCO may consider "scaling back or
 delaying" the mine and smelter complex. Similar concerns
 were raised two weeks ago, but they were dismissed by Inco.

 ------------

CBC Regional News - Saturday, December 27, 1997

 There's been a steady decline in mineral exploration in the
 province, since the rush which followed the discovery of
 Voisey's Bay. In the aftermath of that find, exploration
 companies spent more than 100-million dollars in the
 province in just one year. The figures for the year now
 ending show the total has dropped, to about 73-million
 dollars. And the Minister of Mines says next year it's
 expected to be down again, to about 60-million dollars. But
 Chuck Furey says it doesn't mean the exploration bubble has
 burst. Furey says there are still people coming in daily to
 stake new claims, and mining companies are still showing a
 lot of interest in the province. The Opposition Mines
 critic agrees. Paul Shelley says the province couldn't have
 expected the exploration stampede which followed Voisey's
 Bay to continue. Shelley says he too is hearing from
 companies that still plan to explore here, and he's
 expecting some good news soon from some of the prospects in
 his part of the province, around Baie Verte.

Back to top

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION ALERT - Protect Your Right to Know

DVStern                          env.justice               5:21 PM  Jan 10, 1998
(at aol.com)

Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 13:02:10 -0800 (PST)
From: lff@lff.org (Libraries for the Future)
Sender: owner-pub-adv@s1.net
FROM:  Sarah Clachar, Field Coordinator
DATE: January 7th

VICTORY FOR LIBRARY AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION ADVOCATES

Congratulations and thanks to everyone who wrote in support of the creation
of a National Institute for the Environment (NIE) and a National Library
for the Environment (NLE).  On November 7th, Congressmen Jim Saxton (R-NJ)
and Neil Abercrombie (D-HI) and a bipartisan group of 33 members of the
U.S. House of Representatives introduced H.R. 2914, the Sound Science for
the Environment Act, which would authorize and direct the National Science
Foundation to establish a National Institute for the Environment.  Write to
your Representative and make sure they support this bill!  For more
information about the NIE and the NLE, contact the Committee for the
National Institute for the Environment (202) 628-4311 or visit their
website at <http://www.cnie.org>.

ACTION ALERT:  PROTECT YOUR RIGHT TO KNOW

Our right to know about pollution in our communities is being threatened at
the state and federal level!  Laws allowing industries to conceal
environmental and safety studies have been enacted in 21 states and are
presently in committee at the federal level.  Protect your access to
critical safety information by joining Libraries for the Future's latest
Action Alert.  See the reverse for more detailed information.

CLICK ONE:  Send a letter to, call, or email your Senator voicing your
opposition to S. 866 (Hutchison/Lott) and S 1332 (Enzi) by January 31,
1998.  See sample letter and instructions for finding your senator's email
address below. Please feel free to make changes as you see fit.

CLICK TWO:  If you are facing these laws in your state, contact the Network
Against Corporate Secrecy to find out who is organizing against them and
how you can get involved.  The Network, led by Sanford Lewis in Boston, is
an association of community-based groups around the country who are taking
on this legislation. You can reach the Network at (617) 254-1030,
<sanlewis@igc.apc.org>, <http://www.envirolink.org/orgs/gnp/nacs_toc.htm>.

CLICK THREE:  Find out if your local library has a special health and
safety information collection for nearby industrial facilities.  If so,
contact your librarian or the local Friends of the Library group to find
out how you can support it.  Call us at LFF for more information on how to
support your public library, in general, and, specifically, in providing
environmental information.

Please read the full Action Alert below to learn how you can help.  Your
action is urgently needed to influence this policy decision now!  Call us
at our toll free number (800-542-1918) or send us email <lff@lff.org> and
let us know how you participated in this Action and what other ways we can
help you with your local advocacy efforts.  Join us as we create a national
rapid response network of library advocates who stand up for libraries
everyday, not just when there is a crisis!  LFF is a member organization of
the American Library Association and works in partnership with librarians
and library advocates in addressing library issues.

For more information about how to use your public library to access
environmental information, order a free copy of the updated 1997 version of
The Environmentalist's Guide to the Public Library
<http://www.lff.org/services/envgui.html>.  Contact Sarah Clachar at
<sarahf@lff.org> or call 800 542-1918.

PROTECT YOUR RIGHT TO KNOW

Libraries are being prevented from providing essential environmental
information causing communities to lose a vital resource.  Laws at the
state and federal level are allowing industries who voluntarily disclose
violations and promise to clean them up to conceal internal safety and
environmental studies or "audits:"

Twenty one states have already passed "audit privilege" laws including
Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Kansas,
Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, Oregon,
South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Wyoming.  They are
pending in at least 13 other states.  Proposed federal legislation modeled
on these laws is also making its way through the House and Senate.

These laws protect companies who voluntarily disclose environmental
violations from prosecution for these violations.  Information within a
voluntary self-audit cannot be disclosed to the public and cannot be used
as evidence in legal proceedings.  This includes preventing individuals who
have participated in self-audits from testifying in any judicial proceeding
or administrative hearing.  Furthermore, some states have made it illegal
for employees or government officials to divulge information related to
self-audits.  In Texas, if a person divulges such information and it leads
to penalties against the polluter, the individual who divulged the
information must pay the polluters' fines, penalties and other costs.
Finally, these laws apply to governments as well as private corporations.

Help stop this legislation and insure that communities have access to
essential environmental information.

CLICK ONE:  Send a letter, call, or email your Senator voicing your
opposition to S. 866 (Hutchison/Lott) and S 1332 (Enzi) by January 31,
1998.  To get an electronic version of this letter, see our website
<http://www.lff.org>.  Please feel free to make changes as you see fit.

CLICK TWO:  If you are facing these laws in your state, contact the Network
Against Corporate Secrecy to find out who is organizing against them and
how you can get involved.  The Network, led by Sanford Lewis in Boston, is
an association of community-based groups around the country who are taking
on this legislation. You can reach the Network at (617) 254-1030,
<sanlewis@igc.apc.org>, <http://www.envirolink.org/orgs/gnp/nacs_toc.htm>.

CLICK THREE:  Find out if your local library has a special health and
safety information collection for nearby industrial facilities.  If so,
contact your librarian or the local Friends of the Library group to find
out how you can support it.  Call us at LFF for more information on how to
support your public library, in general, and, specifically, in providing
environmental information.

If you are a librarian looking for professional support in creating such a
collection, contact the American Library Association's Task Force on the
Environment (TFOE). Fred Stoss, chairperson of TFOE, can be reached at
(716)645-2946 x224 or <fstoss@acsu.buffalo.edu>.

Please send a copy of your letter to LFF or call or email us to let us know
what you did on this Action at 800-542-1918, <lff@lff.org>.

HOW TO REACH YOUR SENATOR:

If you are unfamiliar with the names of your representative or senators,
call your local librarian.

By phone: (202) 224-3121. Ask to be switched to your senator.

By email: When sending email be sure to include your postal address. To
find senator's email address, call their office or visit the Senate and
House web pages:

<http://www.senate.gov/>

By post: For postal mail, send your letter to:

Office of Senator (Name)
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510

SAMPLE LETTER

Dear Senator,

I am a public library advocate who strongly believes in people's right to
have access to information that affects the health of their communities,
their families and the individual.  I am writing to express my unqualified
opposition to S. 866 (Hutchison/Lott) and S.1332 (Enzi).  This bill would
allow industries who voluntarily disclose violations and promise to correct
them to conceal environmental and safety studies ("self-audits") from
scrutiny by the government and the public; and immunize companies from
civil, and even some criminal, penalties.

Proponents of these new polluter secrecy and immunity rights claim they
will promote voluntary compliance with environmental laws.  In reality, by
establishing a broad secrecy "privilege" for information contained in
environmental audits, S. 866 (Hutchison/Lott) and S.1332 (Enzi) would
seriously undermine the public's right to know.  Allowing companies to
designate internal paper trails or data relating to environmental problems
as a secret "audit" would keep citizens in the dark, while benefiting only
those with something to hide.  Without access to the wide range of factual
information companies would be authorized to conceal, the victims of
harmful pollution practices will be prevented from obtaining protection and
redress.

S. 866 (Hutchison/Lott) and S.1332 (Enzi) would eviscerate the right of
citizens to enforce federal environmental laws.  Recognizing that citizens
affected by pollution violations are often the only ones willing to take
firm action, Congress had the vision to preserve a critical role for the
public as partners in enforcement in many of our national environmental
laws.  However, by denying public access to vital information and shielding
violators from penalties, this bill will effectively strip from citizen's
hands the legal tools we need to protect ourselves and to hold violators
accountable.

Rates of non-compliance with environmental laws remain persistently high.
A recent U.S. Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) study of Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) data found that one in five major polluters was in
significant violation of the Clean Water Act during a recent period.
Congress should be giving environmental law enforcement agencies and their
citizen partners more tools to do their jobs, not tying their hands and
letting polluters police themselves.

Finally S. 866 (Hutchison/Lott) and S.1332 (Enzi) is completely
unnecessary.  The bill's legitimate goals - to encourage environmental
self-auditing and promote voluntary compliance - can be, and are being
accomplished without secrecy "privileges" and immunity "incentives" that
hurt our right to know, excuse serious violations, and inflame public
distrust.  More and more companies are utilizing self-auditing as a
compliance tool.  Meanwhile, there is no evidence that "audit privilege"
laws similar to S. 866 (Hutchison/Lott) and S.1332 (Enzi) enacted at the
state level have brought about any significant improvement in environmental
compliance.

The EPA's Audit/Self-Policing policy is already accomplishing this bill's
goals with notable success.  Under EPA's Policy, which contains no secrecy
privilege and no immunity for criminal violations, but mitigates civil
penalties for self-disclosed violations in appropriate cases, 105 companies
have disclosed violations at 350 facilities in the past year, and EPA has
already settled matters with 40 companies and 48 facilities, waiving
penalties in most cases.

The conclusion is clear:  S. 866 (Hutchison/Lott) and S.1332 (Enzi) is an
unnecessary attack on environmental law enforcement, workers,and the
public's right to know about pollution.  We strongly urge you to oppose
this legislation.

Sincerely,

PROFILE
CHANNELVIEW, TEXAS

The North Channel Public Library near Channelview, Texas, is in the heart
of the Houston Ship Channel Area, near Galveston Bay, Texas; what is
sometimes called "Cancer Alley."  Surrounded by petroleum and petrochemical
facilities, the immediate area has plants owned by Shell, Exxon, Mobile,
ARCO and Union Carbide.  The library's entryway contains a memorial to the
people killed on the job at nearby plants as a somber reminder of the
hazards of the local industry.

The library is an integral part of the community's effort to live with such
dangerous neighbors.  The branch librarian, Patricia Lippold, is a member
of the Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC).  The library itself
houses the Local Emergency Planning Committee Environmental and Emergency
Awareness Resource Center.  The Center serves as an archive for the LEPC,
maintaining meeting minutes and agendas, as well as regularly updated
reports from the local plants.  There are also resources from the federal
and state government and environmental groups; and information on hazardous
materials and exposure procedures. Ms. Lippold reports that people use the
Center when they are worried about a smell from a nearby facility or when
they are working in one of the plants and want information on the safety
conditions.  Overall, the local industry has been supportive of the Center,
donating funds to the library and providing material on production
processes and its risks.  Ms. Lippold regularly communicates with plant
librarians for help in answering reference questions.

Public libraries have been key allies to communities facing environmental
hazards from local industries by maintaining special collections such as
the one at the North Channel Public Library.  In another Texas community,
Manchester, a "Good Neighbor Agreement" between the community and the
Rhone-Poulenc chemical plant was forged in response to an accident that put
27 people in the hospital.  The agreement specifically cited the public
library as the place to maintain all public information about the plant.

The state and federal audit privilege laws would make it impossible for
libraries to serve this critical function.

----------------------------------------------------------------
To post a message to the list, send to: pub-adv@s1.net
----------------------------------------------------------------
To Leave The List:
            Email:     pub-adv-request@s1.net
      in the body:    unsubscribe
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please direct any problems or inquiries to tpreston@aimnet.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
PUB-ADV is a service of Libraries for the Future, a national
non-profit organization of public library advocates.
<www.lff.org>

Back to top

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

3. EPA Releases National Inventory of Contaminated Sediments

Date:         Thu, 8 Jan 1998 13:18:38 EST
Sender: Environmental Studies Discussion List <ENVST-L@BROWNVM.BROWN.EDU>
Comments:     Originally-From: THCLAX00@UKCC.UKY.EDU

PR/EPA RELEASES NATIONAL INVENTORY OF CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS/SCROLL
FOR RELEASE:   WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 7, 1998

EPA RELEASES NATIONAL INVENTORY OF CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency today, as requested by
Congress, released its first-ever national report on the quality of
sediments in the nation's rivers and other inland and coastal
waterways.  The report finds that the majority of watersheds do not
pose probable adverse risks but that seven percent of the surveyed
watersheds are sufficiently contaminated with toxic pollutants to pose
potential risks to people who eat fish from them and to fish and
wildlife.

The risks posed in the seven percent of the watersheds pertain to
subsistence fishers and others who fish those contaminated waters for
food and do not apply to people who eat fish that are commercially
available from grocery stores and restaurants.

EPA Assistant Administrator for Water, Robert Perciasepe, said,
"The report confirms that contaminated sediment is a significant
problem in many watersheds around the country.  The report underscores
the need to finish the job of cleaning up our nation's waters and to
prevent their continued pollution to protect public health."

The data show that every state has some sediment contamination
and that streams, lakes and harbors can be affected.  Sites where the
highest levels of sediment contamination were measured tend to cluster
around larger urban areas and industrial centers and in regions
affected by agricultural and urban runoff.

In preparing this report, EPA assembled the largest set of
sediment chemistry and related biological data ever compiled into a
national database, called the National Sediment Inventory.  EPA
examined approximately two million records from more than 21,000
sampling stations that are located in 1,363 of the 2,111 watersheds
(65 percent) in the continental United States. The locations were
sampled between 1980 and 1993.

EPA classified each of the sampling stations into one of three
tiers based on data recorded for that location: Twenty-six percent of
the samples fell into Tier 1 - adverse effects are probable; forty-
nine percent of the samples fell into Tier 2 - adverse effects are
 possible but expected infrequently; and 25 percent of the samples fell
into Tier 3 - no indication of adverse effects.  EPA classified
watersheds as "areas of probable concern" if they contained 10 or more
Tier 1 sampling stations and if 75 percent or more of all the sampling
stations in that watershed were classified as either Tier 1 or Tier 2.
This classification approach showed that 96 watersheds, or seven
percent of those surveyed, are sufficiently contaminated to pose
potential risk to people who eat fish and to fish and wildlife.  More
than two-thirds of these watersheds already have active fish
consumption advisories in place.

Sediments are soils, sand and other matter that wash from land
and settle on the bottom of a river, lake, bay or the ocean floor.
Sediment at many sites throughout the United States was polluted years
ago by chemicals such as DDT,  polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and
mercury.  These pollutants may accumulate in fish and may cause
increased risks of cancer, neurological and IQ impairment in people
who eat large quantities of contaminated fish.  While use of these
substances has been banned or restricted for many years, these
chemicals can--and do--persist for many years in the sediment, and
continue to be a source of concern for the environment and public
health.  Other chemicals that are released to surface waters from
industrial and municipal discharges and polluted runoff from urban and
agricultural areas continue to accumulate to harmful levels in
sediments.

Over the last two decades,  EPA and the states have taken a
number of actions to ensure that future contamination of sediments is
prevented.  These measures include:  imposing the strongest
restrictions ever taken on incineration emissions, which can travel by
air to water and be deposited in sediments; cutting discharges of
toxic and hazardous pollutants in wastewater by one billion pounds per
year; cleaning up contaminated sediment in hot spots in the Great
Lakes basin and in major bays and coastal areas throughout the
country; setting protective water quality standards to limit toxic
pollutant discharges in the Great Lakes region;  and reducing polluted
runoff from U.S. urban and agricultural areas.

EPA has established four goals to guide future efforts to manage
contaminated sediment:  1) prevent the volume of contaminated sediment
from increasing;  2) reduce the volume of existing contaminated
sediment;  3) ensure that sediment dredging and dredged material
disposal are managed in an environmentally sound manner; and,  4)
develop scientifically sound sediment management methods.  Over the
next three months, EPA will finalize a strategy to help the nation
achieve these goals.

The national inventory of sediment quality, compiled at the
request of Congress under the Water Resources Development Act of
l992, was prepared in consultation with the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the Army Corps of Engineers and
other federal, state and local agencies.

Additional information on local contamination is available from
EPA's Index of Watershed Indicators on the Internet at
http://www.epa.gov/surf/iwi.   Copies of EPA's fact sheet (EPA 823-F-
98-001) or the three-volume report: "The Incidence and Severity of
Sediment Contamination in Surface Waters of the United States" (EPA
823-R-97-006, EPA 823-R-97-007, and EPA 823-R-97-008) are available
from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for
Environmental Publication and Information, 11029 Kenwood Road, Bldg.
5, Cincinnati, Ohio 45242; fax:  1-515-489-8695; e-mail:
waterpubs@epamail.epa.gov.  The fact sheet is also available on the
Internet at http://www.epa.gov/OST/.

R-1

Back to top

Disclaimer

EarthWINS Daily is a project of EarthWINS.

** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, material in this issue of EarthWINS Daily is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. **

The articles in EarthWINS Daily are PHOTOCOPIES for personal informational purposes--please seek reprint permission directly from the source listed. You are encouraged to utilize this information for personal campaign use; including writing letters, organizing campaigns and forwarding. All efforts are made to provide accurate, timely pieces; though ultimate responsibility for verifying all information rests with the reader.

If you distribute information contained in EarthWINS Daily, please:

(1) Copy the information in its exact form,
(2) Cite the author, publisher, and date of the information.
(3) Include this subscription information for EarthWINS Daily - 

To subscribe to EarthWINS Daily send an email to 
EarthWINS-Daily-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

Subscribe to EarthWINS_Daily

EarthWINS P O Box 573 Shawano, WI 54166 Ph: 715-524-5998 FAX (call first): 715-524-9958 EarthWINS-Daily@earthwins.com www.earthwins.com

Please sign my guestbook

Back to top